Copyright 2013. Slee Canine Training & Security. All rights reserved.

This is a short thesis explaining what the mentioned form of communication is and how it works, which the F.B.I. began investigating in 1994, allegedly being unaware of it and it's use prior to that. There are multiple references available which substantiate the existence of this cryptographic language, but for purposes of simplicity and due to current time constraints, it will be expounded upon in a straight forward and un-technical manner.

The Cryptographic Form of Communication

Used By the “Underground”, Investigated and Deciphered By the F.B.I. In 1994-95

                                                                THE CRYPTO THESIS


      There are traditionally two forms of known methods of communication between humans: words expressed by voice and/or writing, and; sign language. Both of these are merely interaction of certain body parts, combining to create a comprehensible way of understanding what is being conveyed.
     Unknown intellectually to some, yet understood and acknowledged to most all, perhaps unconsciously to most, there is yet another form of “language”, which falls partly into the spiritual realm, which intangible phenomenon is realized by believers in a God and atheists alike, and indeed by animals, and is separate from the spiritual realm associated with the Christian experience.
     Science recognizes two main forms of the spiritual realm: the paranormal and the supernatural. Science debunks the paranormal, while acknowledging that the supernatural is indeed an actual world, yet not explainable by science. The word supernatural literally means 'above science'.
     Psychology admits that there is a spiritual realm, while not necessarily crediting an Almighty with being the creator of that invisible world. Psychology realizes that not only do humans respond to unseen forces, but animals do as well.
     The spiritual world is manifested in various ways. A man arrives home and wishes to kiss his wife or girlfriend and give her a hug, but as he is starting to do so, something not seen prevents him, and then she darts away, explaining that she has a headache. A little boy sneaks into the kitchen to steal some cookies, and just as he opens the jar, ever so silently, something pricks his senses and he cringes, being aware of some kind of presence. And then, his mother sternly calls to him from another room, still sitting in her chair, “Johnny, what are you doing?” An employee does something at work which is forbidden, and for some reason, he feels remorseful. Why is this?
     A trainer has spent much time training his dog, including things which it ought not to do, such as getting into the trash. One day, the dog walks into the kitchen, and as it goes towards the trash can, the master sticks his head around the corner, not making a noise, and glares at the dog, while the dog's back is turned to the owner, the result being that the dog cringes and stops. What told the dog to refrain? After all, the dog couldn't have had time to smell the change in the master's scent, which does change with frame of mind or mood.
     If no spiritual realm at all exists, then why do humans, and even animals, mourn when a loved one dies or is down and out? Why do mammals become happy at seeing something which pleases them? How can people be joyous and laughing one minute, and when a gloomy person enters the room, suddenly fall silent and become morose? What causes a person to feel uncomfortable when it becomes clear that they are in a setting which illustrates that they are very out of place? How would a rock feel if placed on a table in a bakery, or would it feel anything at all? Of course not.

     There is no tangibly evident reason for many of the frames of mind or emotion which people fall into, and only one explanation exists as to why inanimate objects feel nothing no matter what, and living beings do: a spiritual, or unseen, realm of some sort.
     Going on, Christians and adherents to other faiths, believe that we are influenced and directed by spirits, both good and evil, and Native Americans and other indigenous folks have always acknowledged that a spirit world exists. But how does this all tie in with an unspoken language which largely lacks any visible motion such as signs with hands and such?
     Scientists claim that humans have a main scent, but which changes some as the person's mood changes. This is why a dog reacts unfavorably when it approaches a person or animal which is afraid of that dog, causing the dog to go into chase and prey drive. You might properly describe that as a certain aura, or spirit, not exactly an angelic-like being, either good or bad, but yet an unseen “force”, which influences and/or directs. These kinds of things a dog, and other animals, detect, quite acutely, though not necessarily consciously, as far as recognizing it as such. Dogs also detect extremely slight changes in a handler's posture or movement.
     One task I train my dogs to do is to stop and wait on command. Both of those commands are executed from a walking movement. The dogs know that so well that just as soon as I think to give one of those commands, they instantly do so. I used to think that it was a case of a dog being able to read my mind. I have since found out that it is because a dog recognizes the very slight body movements, or cues, which precede any given command, and respond accordingly.

     Nonetheless, one time I was in the woods with my dog, an area to which we'd often went. Suddenly, the dog stopped, and was staring intently at something, or seemed to be. She then bolted and ran back to the house. No amount of calling her would persuade her to come back, and it required dragging her to follow once I arrived back at the house, so I left her there. 

     The area in which the dog ran off from was fairly open, lacking an abundance of vegetation, and a quick search right after she ran revealed nothing out of the ordinary. This was during the eighties, so it is unlikely that any type of technological device was present, which could have emitted a frequency that disturbs a dog. What was it? I can only ascribe it to something spiritual or supernatural.
     Humans recognize and respond to similar movements, or change of movements, and cues, though not nearly as precisely. For example, when someone walks up to you and spreads their arms, it is conveyed that they want a hug. When an employee knows a routine at work well, and fails to perform some task, he or she automatically knows to go to it when the boss casts a certain look or even has a particular demeanor. And many such other things are also evident.
     I do believe that some of those things, especially in a human, are of a spiritual nature, but not all are. Some can be explained by certain vibrations emanating from the other person, which are merely extensions of thought.
     With any given action, there is, accompanying it, a certain spirit, aura or set of vibrations which spring from the immediate environment surrounding that set of doings. There is a distinct difference between a work environment and a casual one such as at a party or when at home lounging. Some companies have parties at the place of employ. Certainly the aura, or spirit, is an entirely different one than when conducting the business of the day.
     If you notice, there is a different aura between a civilian, a police officer, a businessman, a politician, a farmer, a private investigator and an FBI agent. Different auras are present with each, and actually help to complete the required tasks. Whether these different, immediate environments are some type of spirits, auras or set of vibrations could be subject to some interpretation, but they do indeed exist.
     It is easy to recognize the difference between a woman who is ready to make love and one who is “cold” and cranky. An angry man is evident from a happy one, even if each has the same expression on his face and posture. Something unseen reveals the nature of each situation. What, if the spiritual does not exist, tells someone that one person is conning them and another is sincere? Why, in some instances, does it seem right to veer from someone who has no angry expression and company with another who has a perpetual frown on their face? What tells us that some person's smile is false?
     Taking these things into account assures us that people can communicate via means other than speaking or utilizing hand signals.
     People can actually create a particular “setting”, spirit or mood, by thought and action combined, which is called seducing of spirits in the Bible [I Timothy 4:1]. Again, this is also explained in part by vibrations emitted from the human body which change according to thought and mood. Take a teacher which is very strict and demanding, making the students tense and uptight, compared with an easy going, happy go lucky instructor which results in a relaxed atmosphere. Some things would be considered seducing of spirits, while other created environments are simply synonymous with what is happening, conducive to the situation at hand. The key to discerning the difference is in intent.
     Dogs can be conditioned, illustrated by Pavlov and his dogs, to act a certain way, first by traditional training, and eventually by body language and demeanor, even unseen by the human eye. Humans also can be conditioned in like manner. Does the driver who is travelling a little bit too fast need to have it explained what the cop means when looking at the person in the vehicle a certain way?
     There are those who have taken all of these factors and turned them into an art form, using certain methods and such by which to direct and control others. Classes which managers of people attend teach them how to control people, using a variety of psychological concepts. That can be either good or bad, again, depending upon the intent of the orchestrator of control.
     This is the foundation for "cryptographic" methods used by the "underground" group we investigated during the nineties, by which to communicate to one another, easy to understand once the basics are understood. In a nutshell, once a person is conditioned to recognize what a leader's moods intend for the “recipient” to do, coupled with key words and quips, it is not difficult to see how a person can be trained to react and do without any real verbal instruction.

     This same method of communication is widely used by intelligence people, police informants and criminals alike, in order to escape detection of what is being conveyed, but it is a faulty replacement for verbal or written interaction, as meanings can be misinterpreted and lack of detail for vital parts of operations exists. A real potential for misuse of people is evident in the midst of this abstract method of meting out data, which I have witnessed time and again. 

     I have tried to explain to many under cover people, that nothing can replace genuine, clear and detailed instructions and exchanging of ideas or info, but a grave lack of perception of the necessity of down to earth base modes is prevalent these days. Further, I've expounded, when secrecy is required, the use of programs such as kerberos, vpn and other applications for maintaining private communications is readily available.

     Not only that, but that form of conveying messages or ideas, has been utilized for the purpose of harassing, intimidating and demeaning those who have no idea what the "language" means. Currently, this page lacks vivid examples of how the abuse works, but I will provide some exemplifications, so as to make it more clear and concise. 

     "Where no counsel is, purposes are disappointed; but in the multitude of counselors they are established"-King Solomon [this is not to encourage the "groupie" concept, which causes an investigative failure every time].

     "Where there is no wise guidance, the nation falls, but in the multitude of counselors there is victory."-King Solomon. 

     "A worthless person, a wicked man, Is the one who walks with a perverse mouth; Who winks with his eyes, who signals with his feet, Who points with his fingers;…"- King Solomon [this does not include, for example, soldiers who have a pre-planned set of hand and other signals by which to communicate, when in areas inhabited or frequented by the enemy, who would be more likely to discover them if communicating orally]. 

​     Revised on 01/27/2018.